Monetary anchoring is one of the main arguments put forward by central banks to justify an eponymous digital currency. According to supporters of the digital euro, a reduction in the use of paper money or even its disappearance would be the natural next step and result in the creation of a digital form of central bank currency that would be the only guaranteed way of keeping the currency anchored in the digital era. Nothing could be less obvious.
In November 2021, during a speech on the digital euro, Fabio Panetta, then a member of the ECB’s executive board, stated: “People’s confidence in private money is underpinned by its convertibility on a one-to-one basis with the safest form of money in the economy – central bank money, the monetary anchor – and hence with other regulated forms of money”. He added: “Private issuers [of currency, i.e. banks, editor’s note] have to rely on convertibility, as their money is exposed to operational, credit, liquidity and market risks,” while also noting that “these risks are reduced through public policy safeguards, such as financial supervision, capital requirements and deposit insurance”.
In a recent article also addressing concerns – which they believe to be exaggerated – about bank disintermediation as the result of a digital euro, Bindseil, Cipolonne and Schaaf (2024)posit the theory that the decline in use of banknotes for daily transactions will also eventually reduce the structural demand for banknotes. To support their claims, they point out that the nominal stock of banknotes decreased in 2023 for the first time since 2002 in the euro area, which they attribute to higher interest rates and the digitalisation of payments. In the light of the supposed risk of the reduced role as anchor coupled with the fall in banknotes in circulation, the ECB needs to ensure that “the money [it issues] maintains its role as a monetary anchor”.
But the combination of a reduction in use of banknotes as a payment instrument and a decline in banknotes in circulation does not really stand up to the facts. Despite decreased demand for banknotes for retail transactions, banknotes outstanding rose by 2.4x between 2002 and 2022 while, at the same time, its relative size increased from around 10% of household current accounts to 17.5%. These opposing trends are known as the “paradox of banknotes”. Meanwhile, cash is still the most frequently used payment method at the point of sale, despite the sharp decline in use of cash since the Covid pandemic, with 59% of transactions (in terms of the number) still paid in cash in 2022. According to ECB estimates, demand for banknotes in 2019 was motivated more to keep them as store of value (between 28% and 50%) than to pay for transactions (between 20% and 22%). A large proportion of demand also came from non-EU residents (between 30% and 50%).
In any case, the quality of anchoring of the commercial bank money to the central bank currency is not measured so much on the basis of the amount of the cash currency in the economy as on the basis of use of the commercial bank currency that is anchored to it. Economic agents willingly use the commercial bank currency rather than the central bank currency because they are confident that they will be able to convert deposits held with commercial banks into the central bank currency (hence the risk of a bank run when confidence slips). And this confidence in the value of the commercial bank money cannot be underpinned by just the deposit guarantee. Although this system guarantees reimbursem*nt of a certain amount expressed in the euro unit of account as issued by the central bank (€100,000 since 2014 in the European Union), it does not guarantee in any way that one euro deposited with a commercial bank will always be worth one euro deposited with any other commercial bank and one euro issued by the central bank. This guaranteed equal value is ensured only by the ability to convert the commercial bank currency into the central bank currency at parity (cross-parity of euros from different commercial banks, in some way, by analogy with cross exchange rates). In other words, the ability to go to a bank counter or ATM to get cash in exchange for funds deposited with the bank, at parity. The number of ATMs has been in decline in the eurozone since 2015 but, as the ECB stresses, the density of ATMS is not the most relevant measure of ease of access to cash. The interpretation of this indicator is based on the implied assumption that cash machines’ elimination is distributed uniformly across each country and among its population, which is not the actual situation. In this regard, a recent ECB study states that the proportion of people living within 5 km of the nearest cash access point in 2020 ranged from 77% to 100% in the various countries in the eurozone, with a median of 95% for all countries. Furthermore, in 2019, 89% of citizens of the eurozone considered it “easy” or “very easy” to access an ATM, while just 2% considered it “very difficult”. Furthermore, it should be noted that the withdrawal of cash at some merchants (cashback) sometimes supplements the ATMs in areas with low density levels.
The ECB is presenting the digital euro as the digital counterpart to coins and banknotes. However, there is a real risk that consumers will regard it more as a substitute for bank accounts, particularly due to the similarity in means of payment and means of holding money between the digital euro and euros held in a commercial bank account (which, incidentally, has been a kind of “digital euro” since the euro was created in 1999). Importantly, there is the risk of an increase in the cost of banking resources (with the need to replace customer deposits with more expensive refinancing) and hence of bank loans. We believe that the only characteristics of the digital euro that could stem this risk would be a very low holding limit – comparable to the amount of cash reasonably held by each citizen for transaction purposes (a few hundred euros at the very most) – or an exclusively “offline” digital euro held in the form of a digital token stored on a mobile phone, the loss or theft of which would be final, as is the case with... cold, hard cash.
According to Aristotle, the three functions of money are as a medium of exchange, a store of value and a unit of account. These three functions, which are still relevant today, cannot be separated. It is up to the user rather than the issuer of the money to decide the main function they want to attribute in practice to each form of money. For example, we have seen that demand for banknotes was motivated more by the function of money as a store of value rather than as a payment instrument. Despite its clear and justified desire to restrict the “digital counterpart of banknotes” to its role as a medium of exchange, the ECB would be risking opening up a Pandora’s box and creating a new kind of store of value to rival banknotes... and bank deposits, to the detriment of financing the economy and financial stability.
Analysis feed
BNP Paribas is regulated by the FSA for the conduct of its designated investment business in the UK and is a member of the London Stock Exchange.The information and opinions contained in this report have been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express orimplied, is made that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. This report does not constitute a prospectus or otheroffering document or an offer or solicitation to buy any securities or other investment. Information and opinions contained in the report are published for theassistance of recipients, but are not to be relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by any recipient, they are subject tochange without notice and not intended to provide the sole basis of any evaluation of the instruments discussed herein. Any reference to past performance shouldnot be taken as an indication of future performance. No BNP Paribas Group Company accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arisingfrom any use of material contained in this report. All estimates and opinions included in this report constitute our judgements as of the date of this report. BNPParibas and their affiliates ("collectively "BNP Paribas") may make a market in, or may, as principal or agent, buy or sell securities of the issuers mentioned in thisreport or derivatives thereon. BNP Paribas may have a financial interest in the issuers mentioned in this report, including a long or short position in their securities,and or options, futures or other derivative instruments based thereon. BNP Paribas, including its officers and employees may serve or have served as an officer,director or in an advisory capacity for any issuer mentioned in this report. BNP Paribas may, from time to time, solicit, perform or have performed investmentbanking, underwriting or other services (including acting as adviser, manager, underwriter or lender) within the last 12 months for any issuer referred to in thisreport. BNP Paribas, may to the extent permitted by law, have acted upon or used the information contained herein, or the research or analysis on which it wasbased, before its publication. BNP Paribas may receive or intend to seek compensation for investment banking services in the next three months from an issuermentioned in this report. Any issuer mentioned in this report may have been provided with sections of this report prior to its publication in order to verify its factualaccuracy.This report was produced by a BNP Paribas Group Company. This report is for the use of intended recipients and may not be reproduced (in whole or in part)or delivered or transmitted to any other person without the prior written consent of BNP Paribas. By accepting this document you agree to be bound by theforegoing limitations.Analyst CertificationEach analyst responsible for the preparation of this report certifies that (i) all views expressed in this report accurately reflect the analyst's personal viewsabout any and all of the issuers and securities named in this report, and (ii) no part of the analyst's compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related tothe specific recommendations or views expressed herein.United States: This report is being distributed to US persons by BNP Paribas Securities Corp., or by a subsidiary or affiliate of BNP Paribas that is notregistered as a US broker-dealer, to US major institutional investors only. BNP Paribas Securities Corp., a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, is a broker-dealer registeredwith the Securities and Exchange Commission and is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. acceptsresponsibility for the content of a report prepared by another non-US affiliate only when distributed to US persons by BNP Paribas Securities Corp.United Kingdom: This report has been approved for publication in the United Kingdom by BNP Paribas London Branch, a branch of BNP Paribas whosehead office is in Paris, France. BNP Paribas London Branch is regulated by the Financial Services Authority ("FSA") for the conduct of its designated investmentbusiness in the United Kingdom and is a member of the London Stock Exchange. This report is prepared for professional investors and is not intended for PrivateCustomers in the United Kingdom as defined in FSA rules and should not be passed on to any such persons.Japan: This report is being distributed to Japanese based firms by BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch, or by a subsidiary or affiliate ofBNP Paribas not registered as a financial instruments firm in Japan, to certain financial institutions permitted by regulation. BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited,Tokyo Branch, a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, is a financial instruments firm registered according to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan and amember of the Japan Securities Dealers Association. BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch accepts responsibility for the content of a reportprepared by another non-Japan affiliate only when distributed to Japanese based firms by BNP Paribas Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch.Hong Kong: This report is being distributed in Hong Kong by BNP Paribas Hong Kong Branch, a branch of BNP Paribas whose head office is in Paris,France. BNP Paribas Hong Kong Branch is regulated as a Licensed Bank by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and is deemed as a Registered Institution by theSecurities and Futures Commission for the conduct of Advising on Securities [Regulated Activity Type 4] under the Securities and Futures Ordinance TransitionalArrangements.Singapore: This report is being distributed in Singapore by BNP Paribas Singapore Branch, a branch of BNP Paribas whose head office is in Paris, France.BNP Paribas Singapore is a licensed bank regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore is exempted from holding the required licenses to conduct regulatedactivities and provide financial advisory services under the Securities and Futures Act and the Financial Advisors Act. © BNP Paribas (2011). All rights reserved.
