Best & Worst Places to Retire (2024)

After putting in decades of hard work, we naturally expect to have financial security in our golden years. But not all Americans can look forward to a relaxing retirement. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute’s 2023 Retirement Confidence Survey, 64% of workers reported feeling at least somewhat confident that they will have enough money to retire comfortably, but only 27% said they were “very confident.”

If so many American workers are worried about their financial future, what other options provide a pathway to a comfortable retirement? For some, the only solution is to keep working. According to Gallup polling, workers in 2022 planned to retire at age 66 on average, compared to age 60 in 1995. The alternative? Relocate to an area where you can stretch your dollar without sacrificing your lifestyle.

Retirement isn’t all about the money, though. Retirees want to live in a place where they enjoy safety and access to good healthcare, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ideal city will also have lots of ways to spend leisure time, along with good weather.

To help Americans plan an affordable retirement while maintaining the best quality of life, WalletHub compared the retiree-friendliness of more than 180 U.S. cities across 45 key metrics. Our data set ranges from the cost of living to retired taxpayer-friendliness to the state’s health infrastructure.

If you’re considering retiring out of state, make sure to check out WalletHub’s “” ranking, too.

Table of Contents

Main FindingsAsk the ExpertsMethodology

Main Findings

Embed on your website

Best Retirement Cities

Overall RankCityTotal ScoreAffordabilityActivitiesQuality of LifeHealth Care
1Tampa, FL59.934052679
2Scottsdale, AZ59.876120624
3Fort Lauderdale, FL58.178565044
4Orlando, FL58.0930147350
5Miami, FL57.477539461
6Casper, WY57.222703788
7Denver, CO56.9982117139
8Cincinnati, OH56.2910746647
9Charleston, SC55.93172878112
10Atlanta, GA55.85428120110
11San Francisco, CA55.7416322337
12St. Petersburg, FL55.68403028100
13Wilmington, DE55.66443415413
14Minneapolis, MN55.4313696215
15Las Vegas, NV54.75247104167
16Tempe, AZ54.6761493648
17Boise, ID54.5654691632
18Pittsburgh, PA54.06134214417
19Columbia, SC53.9197111269
20San Diego, CA53.9115110966
21Cheyenne, WY53.6441355182
22Missoula, MT53.5990381633
23Cape Coral, FL53.4252672268
24Madison, WI53.3414043816
25Pembroke Pines, FL52.95791051564
26Dover, DE52.91127217173
27Columbia, MD52.721447948
28Richmond, VA52.41503915827
29Honolulu, HI52.31166132103
30Raleigh, NC52.1549776434
31Salt Lake City, UT52.13591516877
32Fargo, ND52.1238166997
33Glendale, CA52.1115444525
34Los Angeles, CA52.03156181380
35Virginia Beach, VA51.6033808038
36Colorado Springs, CO51.5837823970
37Akron, OH51.5373627657
38Washington, DC51.24169163109
39Jacksonville, FL51.151661108125
40Birmingham, AL51.12104817597
41Sacramento, CA50.94115372599
42Tucson, AZ50.915136101133
43Knoxville, TN50.77387140150
44New Orleans, LA50.759112162127
45Chandler, AZ50.5161895660
46Huntington Beach, CA50.35146233551
47Phoenix, AZ50.34614211686
48Port St. Lucie, FL50.262912288106
49St. Louis, MO50.23811618189
50Sioux Falls, SD50.22109143694
51Overland Park, KS50.131171273421
52West Valley City, UT50.075983102136
53Hialeah, FL50.057510627108
54Austin, TX49.891182761121
55St. Paul, MN49.84135328931
56Jackson, MS49.832310814790
57Nashua, NH49.741211118312
58Long Beach, CA49.73156332159
59Tallahassee, FL49.722010172146
60Bismarck, ND49.701161554014
61Philadelphia, PA49.68143314942
62Rapid City, SD49.57103911665
63Mobile, AL49.375100155152
64Columbus, OH49.3098784383
65Peoria, AZ49.1961999392
66Reno, NV49.16326542170
67Lexington-Fayette, KY49.16891561422
68Irvine, CA49.15146463230
69Little Rock, AR49.143911515252
70Portland, OR49.08162177765
71Gilbert, AZ48.95611364658
72San Antonio, TX48.848726109166
73Charleston, WV48.741975119160
74Baton Rouge, LA48.677040153114
75Louisville, KY48.66955959124
76Henderson, NV48.642411610173
77Huntington, WV48.636150139158
78Lincoln, NE48.581101124519
79Portland, ME48.52159244785
80Boston, MA48.40179293011
81Nampa, ID48.395416824128
82Durham, NC48.22861311239
83Mesa, AZ48.09611048791
84Billings, MT47.938416312610
85Grand Rapids, MI47.921126610072
86Norfolk, VA47.683384133115
87Las Cruces, NM47.505715757153
88Fremont, CA47.43163102335
89Chesapeake, VA47.37331527075
90Cedar Rapids, IA47.371311473141
91Fort Worth, TX47.321017355122
92Anaheim, CA47.27146851929
93Nashville, TN47.192258178139
94Glendale, AZ47.13619312184
95Garden Grove, CA47.09146543863
96Oakland, CA47.06160359540
97Santa Clarita, CA47.001541071249
98Juneau, AK46.991295113828
99Cleveland, OH46.951065215146
100Charlotte, NC46.934812481119
101Manchester, NH46.461211465823
102Buffalo, NY46.261324711198
103Huntsville, AL46.2011179117159
104Chattanooga, TN46.1215129169151
105Anchorage, AK46.111148110654
106Kansas City, MO46.06937615074
107Dallas, TX45.9612045115123
108Winston-Salem, NC45.824615153132
109Oceanside, CA45.811517417117
110San Jose, CA45.80161114743
111Albuquerque, NM45.738063142145
112Aurora, CO45.708213913533
113Milwaukee, WI45.691305016136
114Newport News, VA45.6833159136113
115Memphis, TN45.66795180162
116Plano, TX45.63142972955
117Augusta, GA45.611316986177
118Brownsville, TX45.562117674172
119Santa Ana, CA45.41146606771
120Shreveport, LA45.2931170145111
121Oxnard, CA45.231231405295
122Oklahoma City, OK45.214792157135
123Burlington, VT45.05174571312
124Santa Rosa, CA45.011651171862
125Houston, TX44.979456159137
126Seattle, WA44.96180253356
127Lewiston, ME44.911051429893
128Pearl City, HI44.901661651138
129Fort Wayne, IN44.807114984116
130Omaha, NE44.541379812220
131Rochester, NY44.461584112494
132El Paso, TX44.325612360171
133North Las Vegas, NV44.282415485174
134Providence, RI44.1813853103131
135New York, NY44.08182192076
136Montgomery, AL44.061158164180
137South Burlington, VT44.04174961491
138Fort Smith, AR43.968162160157
139Worcester, MA43.9514112011453
140Indianapolis, IN43.948810916778
141Fayetteville, NC43.8214130141178
142Toledo, OH43.7797121113130
143Moreno Valley, CA43.6596181110148
144Springfield, MO43.4577128177101
145Chula Vista, CA43.211511641181
146Laredo, TX43.142817391181
147Tulsa, OK43.1145113172147
148Modesto, CA43.099218265154
149Chicago, IL43.0417622137104
150New Haven, CT43.011711371296
151Columbus, GA42.941816792182
152Grand Prairie, TX42.8712514541140
153Des Moines, IA42.7312414168107
154Corpus Christi, TX42.5653119143168
155Greensboro, NC42.5327134176149
156Salem, OR42.4499160127129
157Irving, TX42.3212513296105
158Riverside, CA42.21100133118143
159Gulfport, MS42.094388179179
160Yonkers, NY41.99181685426
161Jersey City, NJ41.93173908245
162Ontario, CA41.84104161107163
163Garland, TX41.7512514848134
164Lubbock, TX41.6172144156141
165Arlington, TX41.5512513890126
166Warwick, RI41.32138110105144
167Amarillo, TX41.1878172128164
168Spokane, WA41.06119125148118
169Tacoma, WA40.801706413487
170Fontana, CA40.7810217597165
171Fresno, CA40.6858174144156
172Aurora, IL40.65176947967
173Baltimore, MD40.4314455174120
174Vancouver, WA39.7916810312596
175Rancho Cucamonga, CA39.1513317875161
176Wichita, KS39.14108126170155
177Bridgeport, CT39.0917815314618
178Detroit, MI38.55111118182142
179San Bernardino, CA38.2969171173169
180Bakersfield, CA37.9074177132176
181Newark, NJ37.6817286165102
182Stockton, CA35.33113180130175

Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.

Best & Worst Places to Retire (1)

Adjusted Cost of Living

Lowest

  • 1. Brownsville, TX
  • 2. Laredo, TX
  • 3. Huntington, WV
  • 4. Fort Smith, AR
  • 5. Augusta, GA

Best & Worst Places to Retire (2)

Highest

  • T-177. New York, NY
  • T-177. San Jose, CA
  • T-177. San Francisco, CA
  • T-177. Honolulu, HI
  • T-177. Pearl City, HI

Best City vs. Worst City: 2x Difference

Brownsville, TX vs. Honolulu, HI

Best & Worst Places to Retire (3)

Annual Cost of In-Home Services

Lowest

  • 1. Brownsville, TX
  • 2. Laredo, TX
  • 3. Shreveport, LA
  • 4. Jackson, MS
  • T-5. El Paso, TX
  • T-5. Corpus Christi, TX

Best & Worst Places to Retire (4)

Highest

  • T-176. Minneapolis, MN
  • T-176. St. Paul, MN
  • 178. San Jose, CA
  • T-179. Portland, OR
  • T-179. Vancouver, WA
  • 181. Bismarck, ND

Best City vs. Worst City: 3x Difference

Brownsville, TX vs. Bismarck, ND

Best & Worst Places to Retire (5)

% of Employed Population Aged 65 & Older

Highest

  • 1. Plano, TX
  • 2. Irving, TX
  • 3. Burlington, VT
  • 4. Overland Park, KS
  • 5. Sioux Falls, SD

Best & Worst Places to Retire (6)

Lowest

  • 178. Las Cruces, NM
  • 179. Springfield, MO
  • 180. Sacramento, CA
  • 181. Detroit, MI
  • 182. Gulfport, MS

Best City vs. Worst City: 2x Difference

Plano, TX vs. Gulfport, MS

Best & Worst Places to Retire (7)

Recreation & Senior Centers per Capita

Most

  • T-1. Chicago, IL
  • T-1. Philadelphia, PA
  • T-1. San Antonio, TX
  • T-1. Washington, DC
  • T-1. Honolulu, HI

Best & Worst Places to Retire (8)

Fewest

  • 98. North Las Vegas, NV
  • 99. Reno, NV
  • 100. Gilbert, AZ
  • 101. Madison, WI
  • 102. Anchorage, AK

Best City vs. Worst City: 27x Difference

Chicago, IL vs. Anchorage, AK

Best & Worst Places to Retire (9)

Fishing Facilities per Capita

Most

  • T-1. Charleston, SC
  • T-1. Jacksonville, FL
  • T-1. Virginia Beach, VA
  • T-1. Miami, FL
  • T-1. Tampa, FL

Best & Worst Places to Retire (10)

Fewest

  • 143. Cincinnati, OH
  • 144. Tucson, AZ
  • 145. Fresno, CA
  • 146. Oklahoma City, OK
  • 147. El Paso, TX

Best & Worst Places to Retire (11)

Museums per Capita

Most

  • T-1. Washington, DC
  • T-1. San Francisco, CA
  • T-1. Atlanta, GA
  • T-1. St. Louis, MO
  • 5. Miami, FL

Best & Worst Places to Retire (12)

Fewest

  • 174. Port St. Lucie, FL
  • 175. Hialeah, FL
  • 176. Chesapeake, VA
  • 177. North Las Vegas, NV
  • 178. Chula Vista, CA

Best City vs. Worst City: 88x Difference

Washington, DC vs. Chula Vista, CA

Best & Worst Places to Retire (13)

% of Population Aged 65 & Older

Highest

  • 1. Pearl City, HI
  • 2. Scottsdale, AZ
  • 3. Cape Coral, FL
  • T-4. Honolulu, HI
  • T-4. Warwick, RI

Best & Worst Places to Retire (14)

Lowest

  • T-177. Austin, TX
  • T-177. Laredo, TX
  • T-177. Moreno Valley, CA
  • 180. West Valley City, UT
  • 181. Fontana, CA
  • 182. Irving, TX

Best City vs. Worst City: 3x Difference

Pearl City, HI vs. Irving, TX

Best & Worst Places to Retire (15)

'Mild Weather' Ranking

Best

  • 1. Glendale, CA
  • 2. Riverside, CA
  • 3. Bakersfield, CA
  • 4. Scottsdale, AZ
  • 5. Henderson, NV

Best & Worst Places to Retire (16)

Worst

  • T-178. Providence, RI
  • T-178. Warwick, RI
  • 180. Rochester, NY
  • 181. Buffalo, NY
  • 182. Juneau, AK

Show More

Ask the Experts

People plan for retirement at various stages of their lives. But regardless of age, planning ahead can certainly help. To expand the discussion, we asked a panel of experts to share their advice on various factors that prospective retirees should consider as well as retirement-friendly measures for city leaders. Click on the experts’ profiles to read their bios and responses to the following key questions:

  1. What financial factors should retirees take into consideration when deciding where to retire?
  2. What are some tips for living on a fixed income during retirement?
  3. What is the biggest mistake that people make when planning their retirements?
  4. What percentage of income should you aim to replace in retirement?
  5. In planning for retirement, what life expectancy should the average person use to make sure they have saved enough?

Ask the Experts

Carolyn M. Aldwin
Ph.D. – Professor Emerita, Human Development & Family Studies and Director, Gerontology Program – Oregon State University
Read More

Colin M. Slabach
Ph.D. CFP® – Clinical Assistant Professor, Finance and Taxation and Faculty Lead for the Masters in Financial Planning program, School of Professional Studies – New York University
Read More

Rui Yao
Ph.D., CFP® – Professor, Director of Graduate Studies, Personal Financial Planning, Division of Applied Social Sciences – University of Missouri
Read More

Seth Priestle
Adjunct Instructor, Department of Finance, Real Estate, and Insurance and Risk Management, Carl H. Lindner College of Business – University of Cincinnati and Partner, Pension Corporation of America, Cincinnati, OH
Read More

Brian Starr
Provost at Oklahoma Christian University
Read More

Phil Stuczynski
Assistant Teaching Professor of Finance; Faculty Advisor - Intrieri Family Student Managed Fund – Penn State Behrend
Read More

Methodology

To help Americans find the best cities to spend their golden years, WalletHub compared the retirement-friendliness of 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across four key dimensions: 1) Affordability, 2) Activities, 3) Quality of Life and 4) Health Care.

We evaluated those dimensions using 45 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for retirement. For metrics marked with an asterisk (*), the square root of the population was used to calculate the population size in order to avoid overcompensating for minor differences across cities. Data for metrics marked with two asterisks (**) were available at the state level only.

Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample. Our sample considers only the city proper in each case and excludes cities in the surrounding metro area.

With cost being a significant factor in retirement, our analysis assumes retirees will rely on a fixed income. The lower their expenses, the better retirees will fare in a particular city.

Affordability – Total Points: 25

  • Adjusted Cost of Living: Triple Weight (~10.00 Points)
  • Taxpayer-Friendliness: Full** Weight (~3.33 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Tax Rates by State” ranking.
  • Retired Taxpayer-Friendliness: Full** Weight (~3.33 Points)
    Note: This metric measures taxation on retirement income, property and purchases, as well as special tax breaks for seniors.
  • Tax-Friendliness on Estate or Inheritance Tax: Full** Weight (~3.33 Points)
    Note: This binary metric measures where a state has or does not have inheritance tax.
  • Annual Cost of In-Home Services: Half Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Annual Cost of Adult Day Health Care: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)

Activities – Total Points: 25

  • Recreation & Senior Centers per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Fishing Facilities per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Public & Municipal Golf Courses per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
    Note: This metric refers to public and municipal golf courses within 10 miles of city center.
  • Museums per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Theaters per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Art Galleries per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Book Clubs per Capita*: Half Weight (~1.19 Points)
  • Music Venues per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Bingo Halls per Capita*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Availability of Adult Volunteer Activities: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
  • Recreation-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “” ranking.

Quality of Life – Total Points: 25

  • Share of Population Aged 65 & Older: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Elderly-Friendly Labor Market: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Age-Friendly Community: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on the “AARP Network of Age-Friendly Communities” list.
  • Share of Population Aged 65 & Older Living in Poverty: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Share of Population Aged 65 & Older Living Alone: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Walk Score: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Share of Population Aged 65 to 79 with Poor Transit Access: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Mild Weather: Double Weight (~3.33 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “” ranking.
  • Caring Community: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Most Caring Cities in America” ranking.
  • Strength of Elder-Abuse Protections: Full** Weight (~1.67 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “States with the Best Elder-Abuse Protections” ranking.
  • Violent-Crime Rate: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Property Crime Rate: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Air Quality: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
  • Water Quality: Full Weight (~1.67 Points)
    Note: This metric measures the number of drinking water violations from Community Water Systems per 100,000 Residents.

Health Care – Total Points: 25

  • Family Medicine Physicians per 10,000 Residents: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Gerontologists per 10,000 Residents Aged 65 & Older: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Dentists per 10,000 Residents: Half Weight (~0.93 Points)
  • Nurses per 1,000 Residents: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Physical Therapists per 10,000 Residents: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Number of Substance Abuse, Behavioral Disorder, and Mental Health Counselors per 10,000 Residents: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Suicide Rate for Elders: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Health Care Facilities per Capita: Full** Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Quality of Public Hospital System: Full** Weight (~1.85 Points)
    Note: This metric is based on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ ranking of public hospital systems.
  • Top-Rated Geriatrics Hospitals: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Share of Population Aged 65 & Older with a Disability: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Home-Care Facilities per Capita: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Life Expectancy: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)
  • Death Rate of Population Aged 65 & Older: Full Weight (~1.85 Points)

Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Council for Community and Economic Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Environmental Protection Agency, County Health Rankings, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The Kiplinger Washington Editors, Trust For Public Land, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, GreatNonprofits, Transportation For America, U.S. News & World Report, Tax Foundation, Yelp, Meetup, Walk Score, AARP, GolfLink, Genworth Financial, Meetup and WalletHub research.

Supporting Video Files:

Was this article helpful?

Disclaimer: Editorial and user-generated content is not provided or commissioned by financial institutions. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and have not been approved or otherwise endorsed by any financial institution, including those that are WalletHub advertising partners. Our content is intended for informational purposes only, and we encourage everyone to respect our content guidelines. Please keep in mind that it is not a financial institution’s responsibility to ensure all posts and questions are answered.

Ad Disclosure: Certain offers that appear on this site originate from paying advertisers, and this will be noted on an offer’s details page using the designation "Sponsored", where applicable. Advertising may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). At WalletHub we try to present a wide array of offers, but our offers do not represent all financial services companies or products.

Best & Worst Places to Retire (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

Last Updated:

Views: 5606

Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

Birthday: 1993-01-10

Address: Suite 391 6963 Ullrich Shore, Bellefort, WI 01350-7893

Phone: +6806610432415

Job: Dynamic Manufacturing Assistant

Hobby: amateur radio, Taekwondo, Wood carving, Parkour, Skateboarding, Running, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Pres. Lawanda Wiegand, I am a inquisitive, helpful, glamorous, cheerful, open, clever, innocent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.