Toxic Lung Injury in a Patient Addicted to “Legal Highs” – Case Study (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Pol J Radiol
  • v.80; 2015
  • PMC4319657

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Toxic Lung Injury in a Patient Addicted to “Legal Highs” – Case Study (1)

Polish Journal of Radiology

Pol J Radiol. 2015; 80: 62–66.

Published online 2015 Feb 4. doi:10.12659/PJR.892334

PMCID: PMC4319657

PMID: 25691919

Dorota Kulhawik1,B,D,E,F and Jerzy Walecki2,D,E

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Summary

Background

Toxic lung injury may manifest itself in many different ways, ranging from respiratory tract irritation and pulmonary edema in severe cases to constrictive bronchiolitis, being a more distant consequence.

It is most often the result of accidental exposure to harmful substances at work, at home, or a consequence of industrial disaster.

Case Report

This article presents a case of toxic lung injury which occurred after inhalation of legal highs, the so-called “artificial hashish” and at first presented itself radiologically as interstitial pneumonia with pleural effusion and clinically as hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency. After treatment with high doses of steroids, it was histopathologically diagnosed as organizing pneumonia with lipid bodies.

Conclusions

Due to the lack of pathognomonic radiological images for toxic lung injury, information on possible etiology of irritants is very important. As novel psychoactive substances appeared in Europe, they should be considered as the cause of toxic lung injury.

MeSH Keywords: Drugs, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Lung Injury, Radiography, Respiratory Insufficiency

Background

Legal highs – various products containing new psychoactive substances and hallucinogenic substances of plant origin reached Poland about 7 years ago. Chains of “smart shops”, i.e. shops selling psychoactive substances, have been operating in the European Union countries since 2005. They constitute a new and serious medical, social and legal problem.

One of the objectives of a program called the EU Drugs Strategy 2013–2020 is to combat threats connected with new psychoactive substances, for example, by strengthening the current EU legislation. New psychoactive substances, which imitate the effects of drugs, appear and rapidly spread throughout the EU.

At present, there is little information on the harmful impact of novel psychoactive substances on the human body. The data are mostly based on the analysis of these substances whose consumption caused severe damage to human health or even death [1].

The article features the case of a patient addicted to psychoactive substances (including legal highs) with toxic lung injury, which occurred after inhalation of these substances.

The goal of this article was to raise the awareness among doctors with regard to a new potential source of toxic lung injury in Europe and to show that the “legal highs” present threat for health.

Case Report

Following a 4-day stay at the detox ward, a 20-year-old patient with a 5-year-long addiction to marijuana, a history of nicotinism and alcohol dependence, inhaling the so-called artificial hashish for 6 months was admitted to the lung disease department in serious condition with a suspected miliary tuberculosis. On admission, the physical examination demonstrated single bilateral rhonchi and rales over the lung fields, tachypnea, general cyanosis, and saturation of 65–72%. The patient reported catarrh lasting for 6 months; cough lasting 4 months, which was stronger for a week and a half preceding admission to hospital, 4 days of fever, diarrhea and dyspnea at rest. The patient denied hemoptysis or contact with tuberculosis.

Laboratory tests showed hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency, high titres of CRP, LDH, d-dimers, and NT-pro-BNP. Infection with HIV and HBV was excluded.

Oxygen therapy with 6 L/min of Encorton at a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight p.o., Clexane s.c. and antimycobacterial drugs were used.

Imaging examinations were ordered.

Chest X-ray showed diffuse, confluent interstitial changes of the highest intensity in the middle and inferior fields, and trace of pleural effusion. Besides, the image was unremarkable.

First HRCT showed massive generalized shading with air bronchogram in the middle and inferior fields, heterogeneous patchy changes in the superior fields. Complicated interstitial pneumonia with little pleural effusion was suggested.

Bronchofiberoscopy showed features of active inflammation of the bronchial tree.

Only Candida albicans was grown from cultures from bronchial washings; specific, non-specific flora and atypical pathogens (Bordatella pertussis, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Pneumocistis jiroveci) cultures – negative.

Fluconazole p.o. was added to the above-mentioned therapy, which caused gradual clinical improvement.

A control chest HRCT performed after 3 weeks revealed normal cavities, mediastinum and pleura, disseminated confluent small nodules of varying degrees of saturation, local frosted glass-like changes, which in the inferior fields coalesced with nodules of the central part of the pulmonary lobule and thickened interlobular septa. The whole image suggested toxic lung injury to differentiate with P. jiroveci infection.

After five weeks spent in the department, initial clinical improvement and reduced oxygen therapy to 3 L/min, spirometry with diastolic test was performed. The first examination result showed a decrease in VC to 84%, FEV1 89%, FEV 1%, VC 105% of due value. In the second test after administering Berotec: VC 82%, FEV1 94%, FEV 1%, VC 113% of due value. Basing on the results there was a suspicion of restriction. Due to insufficient co-operation with the patient, plethysmography confirming the diagnosis was not performed.

In the histopathological examination (material obtained from open biopsy), the image corresponded to organizing pneumonia with lipid bodies in the organizing lesions; lesions most likely caused by inhaling irritants. A biopsied mediastinal lymph node – reactive (Figures 14).

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

First X-ray - diffuse confluent interstitial changes of the highest intensity in the middle and inferior fields, trace of pleural effusion; besides, the image unremarkable.

Open in a separate window

Figure 4

(A–E) Control HRCT – normal cavities, mediastinum and pleura, disseminated confluent small nodules of varying degrees of saturation, local frosted glass-like changes, which in the inferior fields coalesced with nodules of the central part of the pulmonary lobule and thickened interlobular septa.

Discussion

Acute or subacute chemically-induced lung injury is most often caused by accidental inhalation of chemical agent at work, at home or as a consequence of industrial or environmental disaster [2]. There is a wide spectrum of lung disease complications after administering drugs such as cocaine and its derivatives, especially crack; methamphetamine derivatives, including methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ritalin; Novartis, East Hanover, NJ); opiates such as heroin and methadone, among others; and mixtures of these agents. Furthermore, substances that are commonly mixed with an illicit drug, known as “fillers”, may be primarily responsible for the disease. Fillers include talc, cornstarch, and cellulose [3,4].

Early in the assessment process it is essential to determine the most probable factor, the length and frequency of exposure, which can be achieved by careful examination of a patient’s medical history or witnesses’ observations.

Toxic lung injury may manifest itself in many different ways and the extent of changes caused by inhaling toxic substances depends on their physicochemical properties and the degree of exposure [5,6].

Chemically-induced lung injury includes bronchitis, bronchiolitis, pulmonary edema, ARDS, organizing pneumonia, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis and sarcoid-like granulomatous lung disease [7].

Respiratory complications of drug abuse may involve the upper airways, lungs, and pleura and include pneumonia, pulmonary edema, pulmonary hemorrhage, drug-induced granulomatosis, emphysema, and pneumothorax [3,4,8]. Repeated intravenous injections of various drugs designed for oral intake can lead to severe complications such as pulmonary hypertension or toxic interstitial lung disease [9].

The first symptoms in acute exposure are irritation of the upper respiratory tract and bronchitis. Laryngeal edema and bronchospasm may lead to death. Pulmonary edema [5] in the mechanism of alveolar-capillary barrier damage may occur within the first 48 hours [10]. Superinfection is a common complication in the following days. Potential long-term consequences are bronchial hyperreactivity and constrictive bronchiolitis [5]. Organization, characterized by fibroblast proliferation, is a common and nearly universal response to lung injury whether it is focal or diffuse. Despite the vast range of injurious agents, the lung’s response to injury is quite limited, with a similar pattern of reaction seen radiologically and histologically regardless of the underlying cause [11].

In the case of smoke inhalation, early radiological signs in chest X-ray include perihilar bronchial wall thickening and subglottic swelling, frequently – pulmonary edema. Chest radiogram, which is a first-line study, is often enough to evaluate the extent of damage and to monitor the disease [12].

In our case, interstitial changes prevailed in the radiological examination. However, lipid bodies in the organizing lesions were found in the microscopic examination, which pointed to the concomitance of lipid pneumonia.

Lipid pneumonia is a rare pulmonary disease. It results from damage to the lung parenchyma by lipid molecules originating from the serum (endogenous form) or entering the lung by aspiration or inhalation (exogenous form) [1316].

Endogenous lipid pneumonia most often occurs below a closed bronchus due to a lung tumor [17]. It results from the influx of macrophages accumulating fat coming from alveolar type II epithelial cells. It is also called cholesterol pneumonia due to a significant amount of cholesterol in phagocytes [18,19]. Type II cells produce a surfactant – phospholipid substance regulating the surface tension of the alveoli and thus co-responsible for stabilizing gas in the terminal part of the respiratory system. Pulmonary surfactant is the most sensitive and dynamically changing substance under the influence of various factors damaging pulmonary alveoli [17].

Pathom*orphological changes in the exogenous lipoid pneumonia are chronic and proliferative. In the microscopic examination, lipid bodies are encapsulated by connective tissue containing macrophages [18].

Factors responsible for exogenous lipid pneumonia are varied – mineral oil, petroleum jelly, fish liver oil, oily nose drops, full milk, egg yolk, kerosene, gasoline blend, industrial lubricants, oil, buffalo butter [20].

In adult population, they are most commonly diagnosed in fire-eaters [21] but they may result from occupational exposure to mixtures of oil in manufacturing of steel and furniture, in aviation and – non-occupational exposure – in people using lipstick or lip gloss, people using aerosol substances to apply on joints or spraying hair and people who smoke tobacco with oily additives [13]. Aspiration of volatile organic compounds such as amyl and butyl nitrites (commonly known as “poppers”) during attempted inhalation of vapors may lead to the development of lipoid pneumonia [8]. Due to insufficient information on composition and manner of ingestion of novel psychoactive substances, lipid pneumonia should be taken into consideration in people addicted to legal highs.

Conclusions

Due to the lack of pathognomonic radiological images for toxic lung injury, information on possible etiology of irritants is very important. As novel psychoactive substances appeared in Europe, they should be considered as the cause of toxic lung injury.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

(A–C) First HRCT – interstitial pneumonia, air bronchogram, pleural effusion.

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Control X-ray – regression of pleural effusion, interstitial changes in the superior fields less severe than in the first examination.

References

1. Raport Głównego Inspektora Sanitarnego w sprawie środków zastępczych – trzy lata zwalczania dopalaczy w Polsce. http://www.gis.gov.pl/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Środki%20Zastępcze/raport2013.pdf [in Polish]

2. Andujar P, Nemery B. [Acute and subacute chemical pneumonitis]. Rev Mal Respir. 2009;26(8):867–85. [in French] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Gotway MB, Marder SR, Hanks DK, et al. Thoracic complications of illicit drug use: an organ system approach. Radiograhpics. 2002;22 Spec No:S119–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Mégarbane B, Chevillard L. The large spectrum of pulmonary complications following illicit drug use: features and mechanisms. Chem Biol Interact. 2013;206(3):444–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Garnier R. [Acute toxic pneumopathies]. Rev Prat. 1998;48(12):1319–23. [in French] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Weiss SM, Lakshminarayan S. Acute inhalation injury. Clin Chest Med. 1994;15(1):103–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Akira M, Suganuma N. Acute and subacute chemical-induced lung injuries: HRCT findings. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(8):1461–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ian GH, Kashif B. Radiology of Recreational Drug Abuse, RSNA Education Exhibits, presented as an education exhibit at the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. [Google Scholar]

9. Mayaud C, Boussaud V, Saidi F, et al. Bronchopulmonary disease in drug abusers. Rev Pneumol Clin. 2001;57(4):259–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Wąsowicz M, Biczysko W, Drwiła R. [Effect of exogenous surfactant on alveolar barrier. An experimental study]. Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia. 2002;2:76–80. [in Polish] [Google Scholar]

11. Kligerman SJ, Franks TJ, Galvin JG. From the Radiologic Pathology Archives: Organization and fibrosis as a response to lung injury in diffuse alveolar damage, organizing pneumonia, and acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia. Radiographics. 2013;33(7):1951–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Lee MJ, O’Connell DJ. The plain chest radiograph after acute smoke inhalation. Clin Radiol. 1988;39(1):33–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Adkins D, Bensadoun ES. An 85-year-old man with a lung mass. Chest. 2004;125:1121–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Barta Z, Szabo GG, Bruckner G, Szegedi G. Endogenous lipoid pneumonia associated with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) Med Sci Monit. 2001;7(1):134–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Wright BA, Jeffrey PH. Lipoid pneumonia. Semin Respir Infect. 1990;5:314–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Załeska J, Ptaszek B, Malong P, et al. Lipoid pneumonia in patients after laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Pol. 2007;61(6):1004–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Tamura A, Hebisawa A, f*ckushima K, et al. Lipoid pneumonia in lung cancer: radiographic and pathological features. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:492–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Betancourt SL, Martinez – Jimenez S, et al. Lipoid Pneumonia: Spectrum of Clinical and Radiologic Manifestations. AJR. 2010;194:103–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Robbins LL, Sniffen C. Correlation Between the roentgenologic and pathologic findings in chronic pneumonitis of the cholesterol type. Radiology. 1949;53(2):187–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Krychniak-Soszka A, Lewandowska K, Skorupa W, et al. [Exogenous lipoid pneumonia – a report of four cases]. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2005;73(2):182–88. [in Polish] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Pielaszkiewicz-Wydra M, hom*ola-Piekarska B, Szcześniak E, et al. Exogenous lipoid pneumonia – a case report of a fire-eater. Pol J Radiol. 2012;77(4):60–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Polish Journal of Radiology are provided here courtesy of Termedia Publishing

Toxic Lung Injury in a Patient Addicted to “Legal Highs” – Case Study (2024)

FAQs

What are some ways that addiction can harm other people? ›

There are several ways that your addiction can cause physical harm to those closest to you, including the following:
  • It can cause depression. ...
  • Addiction can lead to violence. ...
  • Children may have PTSD from the trauma that your addiction put them through.
Oct 14, 2022

How can drugs affect you? ›

Long term health impacts such as liver, kidney and heart problems or cancer (depending on the type of drug used and how frequently it was used) Dental health problems (cavities and gum disease) Mental health issues such as anxiety and depression. Dependence.

What is the most common thing people are addicted to? ›

Alcohol. Out of the most common addictions in the United States, drug and alcohol use wins the title. Addictions are known to induce some form of gratification to the person struggling and fill a void. It's important to note that addiction expands past drugs and alcohol.

What are 5 most common types of addiction? ›

Some of the more common addictive substances include:
  • alcohol.
  • opioids, including both heroin as well as prescription pain medication like oxycodone and morphine.
  • cannabis.
  • nicotine.
  • amphetamines.
  • cocaine.
  • methamphetamine.
Feb 28, 2020

What are five consequences of drug abuse? ›

Consequences of addiction on the body may include:

Nausea and abdominal pain, which can also lead to changes in appetite and weight loss. Increased strain on the liver, which puts the person at risk of significant liver damage or liver failure. Seizures, stroke, mental confusion and brain damage. Lung disease.

How does addiction affect the brain? ›

Drugs or alcohol can hijack the pleasure/reward circuits in your brain and hook you into wanting more and more. Addiction can also send your emotional danger-sensing circuits into overdrive, making you feel anxious and stressed when you're not using the drugs or alcohol.

What is the relationship between mental illness and substance use? ›

Substance use can worsen the course of another mental health condition and untreated mental health concerns can increase the vulnerability to high-risk substance use or developing a substance use disorder,” she added. “When both conditions are treated simultaneously, the chances of successful recovery improve.”

What is an addiction and how does it affect people's lives negatively? ›

Addiction is a chronic (lifelong) condition that involves compulsive seeking and taking of a substance or performing of an activity despite negative or harmful consequences. Addiction can significantly impact your health, relationships and overall quality of life.

What are the 10 risk factors for addiction? ›

Risk factors
  • Family history of addiction. Drug addiction is more common in some families and likely involves an increased risk based on genes. ...
  • Mental health disorder. ...
  • Peer pressure. ...
  • Lack of family involvement. ...
  • Early use. ...
  • Taking a highly addictive drug.
Oct 4, 2022

What are some social factors that contribute to the risks of addiction? ›

Social Factors that increase the risk for adolescent substance use can include popularity, bullying, peer relationships, and association with gangs. Other possible factors are social and familial influences are often present simultaneously.

What are the 5 effects of drug abuse on youth? ›

Substance-abusing youth are at higher risk than nonusers for mental health problems, including depression, conduct problems, personality disorders, suicidal thoughts, attempted suicide, and suicide.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tish Haag

Last Updated:

Views: 6166

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tish Haag

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 30256 Tara Expressway, Kutchburgh, VT 92892-0078

Phone: +4215847628708

Job: Internal Consulting Engineer

Hobby: Roller skating, Roller skating, Kayaking, Flying, Graffiti, Ghost hunting, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Tish Haag, I am a excited, delightful, curious, beautiful, agreeable, enchanting, fancy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.